PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Bell 212
Thread: Bell 212
View Single Post
Old 12th Jun 2004, 14:53
  #71 (permalink)  
NickLappos
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phoinix, I wasn't clear enough. It counteracts the roll left with right pedal, which is unstable, and not allowed for IFR flight. It does reduce yaw stability, but my guess is there is lots of yaw stability from the basic aircraft layout, so they can give some away to get some dihedral stability.

The rotor downwash is a factor, but might actually help, because the velocity of the combined free stream air and the rotor wash could be even more forceful than the free stream alone.

I'll bet this thing was hung there by trial and error, probably in desparation during the flight test program when the data came out that said the aircraft won't meet the regs. Most of those little fins and fences on wings, tails, tail cones and the like get pasted on as the aircraft is tested, and they are put there by flight test guys who then laugh at the designer's mistakes.

the interplay between testers and designers is fun to watch!

Here is a nice discussion of why dihedral works:
http://members.rogers.com/maxf/ftaf3.pdf

Last edited by NickLappos; 12th Jun 2004 at 15:07.
NickLappos is offline