By the way, I suggest you push for the flight following to go ahead as it will reduce the chance of you being involved in a mid-air collision
How does that gel with your statement (on another pprune thread) that the
NAS savings will come from removing those low level radar sectors that would provide this flight following? In fact, to provide such a service,
free , AsA would indeed lose money as they would have to hire more people to provide it.
So, are you saying that
really NAS will cost more, or that the ozNAS you are introducing will be more dangerous because it doesn't have flight following?
STOP LYING DICK.
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...5&pagenumber=1
Edited to add the hyperlink to show Dick LYING on the other thread.
Just as one example, the Class G sector that operates within 30 miles of Sydney will be unnecessary under the NAS system