Asymmetric Commital Height.
Please - for the purposes of this discussion - no comments on "don't do asymmetric go-arounds".
Assume you are teaching student pilot to fly in a light piston twin - what do you deem to be a suitable asymmetric commital altitude, and does it change with time, experience and rating they hold or are training for??
I've heard figures of 500' agl for new pilots on the class (6hrs training).
I've heard 300' for good daylight, good visibility - with an extra 100' for night or IMC/low vis. conditions.
I've also heard 200' agl (for the new student) "because that will lead them into the instrument rating decision altitude".
What do you teach - and how do you justify the figure? Just curious.
(Wonder how many self confessed experts will try to steer away from the original question, or insist that their opinion is the only correct one).