I said that I hardly thought Duo qualified as a low cost airline.
Explain to me then how Duo had a low cost base because I didn't think the headcount/aircraft ratio, the aircraft type, the home base nor many of the routes were ones associated with low cost airlines.
I didn't think they even wanted to be thought of as a low cost airline? Did they?
There's no need to be brash old chum. Having just searched your username for posts I note that around 50% of them appear to be describable as easyJet bashing. They suggest you are maybe a Flybe pilot with a hatred of easyJet.
This time last year you wrote about easy
I'd give it 6 months. Tops. This really is turning into Air Europe Mark II. (Yes, and I was there before anyone starts AGAIN!)
Well - sorry old chap, flying more pax than BA these days and making money in the process.
Cheer up,
WWW