kilo 52
The BOI stated quite clearly, that due to the lack of evidence, the captain of the aircraft SHOULD not be criticised, and the co-pilot COULD not be criticised, as it was;
impossible to recreate the sequence of events leading up to the accident.
The President of the BOI, was a highly experienced SH (Support Helicopter) pilot, with very extensive Chinook experience. Certainly the most relevant flying experience of any officer involved in the entire BOI!
How can it be that he came to completely the opposite conclusion to you?
Unsurprisingly EVERY SINGLE SUBSEQUENT INQUIRY, has totally endorsed his line of thinking, and discredited yours.
Why do you think that is?