Creampuff wrote:
It’s duplicitous to applaud VOR for coming to a logical conclusion which you happen to like on one hand, but then lambaste VOR for coming to a logical conclusion which you happen not to like on the other.
Woomera wrote:
Pleaase lets keep this civilised shall we and read carefully what the V o R actually said.
IMHO it is a perfectly balanced argument entirely in the context of their previous posts.
Well, let's see, I have responded to VoR's assertions in this thread yet he/they/no-one have addressed it.
It is false to say that Class E is safe if you are only talking of the theoretical application for it.
Awaiting a reply....