Tony, I spoke with Graham yesterday and this is what I was told. Simple as that.
With regards to delays in speaking with George I need to point out once again; you insist on tying the court case to the PFA's actions. We were not instrumental in bringing the CAA prosecution, the PFA members who were at the centre of this went to the CAA of their own accord after reporting the case to us. As a result of that we (as potential witnesses for the prosecution) could not open our discussions with George until after the case was over (that's the law). If it took four weeks for us to speak with George so be it (I really can't say from personal knowledge what is the truth about when Graham or Ken spoke with him).
My point however is that the CAA court case has no bearing on PFA investigation into George Adams case. If Graham lied then I agree it's a bad thing but I can't prove it one way or another, and frankly unless you are going to pin a character assassination campaign on the disputed timing of one phone call I can't see why you are being so dogmatic about it.
Have you spoken to George Adams about what he wants? My understanding is that he just wants to get on with his life here and that's why he hasn't re-applied for his approval.
I've emailed my phone number to you, so it's up to you if you want to contact me.