nongpsuser,
Thanks for the complement.
If the PFA would tell us all what George did wrong instead of this "duty of care" !!!!e, we may understand the reason for them not re-instating him.
If the PFA would have answered the letters from members about the case then I would never have gone to the BB.
If the PFA would have read the petition from over 50 members here (in paddyland) requesting that George be re-instated.
If the PFA had not taken the word of a couple of liars then the case would never have come to court. (I was in court and heard them being exposed as liars).
If the PFA had listened to the engineering dept the case would not have come to court (remember the chief inspector was suspended for standing up for George)
Now don't start about the CAA taking the case anyway, the CAA got its info from the PFA.
If the PFA would stop looking up and covering each others arseholes then you might have a chance of getting this association on the rails again.
Tony Ringland (humble engineer and paddy)