Your apparent backflip (or sellout?) is a matter of concern to me,
VoR.
You have previously posted many sensible, authoratative and informative articles here, all espousing SAFETY as being the singular, over-riding factor to be considered in every instance, but now,
surprisingly, you state...
If separation is NOT required in Class E airspace – why concern yourself when aircraft pass with less than you would use as a controller.
The answer is
SAFETY - simply because we have an "adventurer" who has implemented a
LESS SAFE system in place of one that has provided air travellers with a
BETTER, SAFER system, because he "believes" that it
might give G.A. in Australia a boost.
Earlier postings by you,
VoR, make it quite difficullt to believe that this is now the one and same SAFETY-orientated author(s) who has posted this latest topic!