Tony, I don't run! Just can't see any point here, I truly sympathise with your complaints and I seriously can't imagine what it must have been like for George Adams during those two years. As I said before, the democratic processes of membership in the PFA allow for a formal complaint to be made, when it must be investigated. This was done by one of the two members you mention and the rest is history as they say. Personally I really wish one of you had done a similar thing, it would perhaps have balanced things a bit. Leaves a bad taste for all of us. The truth is that one's hands are tied by the rules of the association when a matter like this occurs. If individuals (especially those who may bend the truth) report facts from their official positions it is very difficult to make decisions within the bounds of the rules which contradict those facts (ask Flying Lawyer about that!). One may have gut feelings about this but there are 11 members at a meeting and majority rules I'm afraid, it's called democracy (laughable isn't it). I wish you well.
