It's the PFA's supporters rather than its detractors who are making it look bad here.
My thoughts exactly.
Pinga appears to consider that repeatedly describing those with whom he disagrees as 'morons' is a form of intelligent argument - although, to be fair to him, he did vary it to 'facist' for one post.
I'm not a member of the PFA. I looked at their BB a few times some months ago because I wanted to see what, if anything, was being said about a specific incident. Some posts by those who
appeared to be the PFA 'establishment' contained a number of 'explanations' which I knew to be untrue.
My reading of that topic and a few others while I was browsing left me with the impression that criticism of any decision of the governing body, or the conduct of any member of it, was very unwelcome.
ECMan
"note the spelling please, illiterate gents"?
If you're going to stoop to pointing out the spelling mistakes or typing errors of those with whom you disagree, it's always wise to take extra care with your own. It's 'divisive', not "devisive".
