Ok I have taken a step back an looked at the big picture
Seems like those who know Tony R think he is a decent fellow just standing up for his friend George Adams.
Seems like from, Lord Trefgarne to any other member who has questioned the EC or Management over the last year or so is a trouble maker.
Fact: Two members gave incorrect statments to the CAA, this influenced the CAA's decision to the Adams the case to court.
Fact: Mr L.... another Inspector gave contradictory evidence from the witness stand in the Crown Court,
Have any of the above been suspended. I am sure they in the eyes of the CAA and the Court have brought the association into disrepute
Fact: Ken Craigie was suspended by the then chairman. WHY????
Was it because he refused to suspend George Adams as he thought Mr Adams did nothing wrong????
I know the EC and Management don't want to deal with these questions. but the "Facts" are there for all to see.
Dawn