And so what if one case didn't hold up? The Crown Prosecution Service has many many cases where a "not guilty" verdict is returned every week! The way British law works is that the facts are presented and it is for the prosecution to prove it's case. In the instance in question it failed to do just that. Would you have the Crown Prosecution Service disbanded for losing a percentage of it's prosecutions. Mybe I shouldn't ask that question because the morons here probably would!
It may well be that the PFA have good sound reasons for not re-instating Mr Adams.
The fact is and remains that the PFA is a democratic association and there is a right and wrong way of bringing about change. Yes democracy is the value that is cherished by the majority of people including members of the PFA and Mr Adams faced the democratic process of trial. The facts were duly considered and a "not guilty" verdict returned. In a non democratic society, Mr Adams may well have been dragged out of his house and shot dead without the benefit of a trial!
Why do you morons have a problem with the process of British law, why do you morons have a problem with democracy?
Do you think that a true democratic process should be applied in some cases (Mr Adams) but not in other cases (The PFA exec.)?
Why do I waste my time on you people