The majority of the membership have had enough of the noisy morons who seek to undermine the PFA to the detriment of the majority of it's members who are happy to see the PFA continue pretty much unchanged.
This is unfortunately just the sort of statement people are complaining of. What mandate do you hold from "the majority" to speak on their behalf?
The members present at the AGM did not appear to me to share your opinion. Were I asked for an adjective it would be "concerned" or "worried" rather than "happy to see the PFA continue pretty much unchanged"
While I do not necessarily endorse Tony Ringland's opinions I do not believe he is acting out of malice but out of a sincerely held sense of injustice. Dismissing those whose opinions you do not share as "noisy morons" is unhelpful. It polarises opinions and prevents reasoned debate.
Mike