GtE - you do yourself a disservice, notwithstanding the fact that I know who you are, M'Lord, your posts (across pprune & the pfa bb) are generally useful, informative and timely! They are also brief, clear and pretty concise.
Leaving aside the undeserved complement (but thank you anyway), you make my point for me. Even if they suspect, the reader doesn't absolutely know who I am, they can then only judge the worth of my words on the basis of those alone - if they disagree they can do so without concern about my holding it against them, since I don't technically know who they are either. And equally, they can't hold what I've said against myself, anybody I happen to work for, or any organisation that I belong to.
G
N.B. As I recall it was the Chief Inspector, not the Chief Engineer who was suspended by the (then!) chairman. And also not informed was the CAA, who weren't best impressed about a key member of a delegated organisation being sent home without their knowledge either.