What most of the whingers would like is the 3 months pay due by law in lieu of the 3 months negotiation with staff re the cuts in staff, plus the one months notice period. This isn't greed, this is what is legally their entitlement.
What they have is a promise to pay up to 17 March and 'go forth and multiply for anything else'. Oh sorry, go and see the Govt. despite it being the employers responsibility whilst still trading, which they are.
Frankly it doesn't matter to many who stuffed up, Stoddy or the corpulent fatherless one. What is required is some acceptance of legal responsibilities, as explained by various solicitors to various groups of staff.
The crew now operating flights on the 747 have, I am told, been paid in advance. Wonder if the same deal applies to the ground staff supporting them?
To many of the redundant staff EAAC's survival is a matter of little concern, other than they want what is legally their entitlement. The fact that the CVA document looks designed to hand the airline back to Stoddy on the cheap, whilst leaving the staff high and dry and owed money doesn't make for an even tempered frame of mind.
Name calling is pointless (but might be theraputic
) and doesn't help resolve outstanding issues.