Many thanks BEagle for your persistance.
Whilst the letter from Ingram is little moe than a cut and paste paragraph from the MoD, it is interesting that he now feels the need to point out that both Reviewing Officers are now retired.
I wonder why that is?
You may consider writing back to him, stating that his belief that the reviewing officers have not changed their opinion is correct. However, that is exactly what it is - opinion. Not fact proved with absolutely no doubt whatsoever.
Also, as Ark correctly points out, the information the Reviewing Officers based their opinions on was, in actual fact, not entirely correct.
More evidence that the decision is unsafe!
As always, my thanks for your support.
Brian
"Justice has no expiry date" - John Cook