AI reading our manuals: from scary to scary good
A few months back, asking AI a technical aviation question was a gamble. Answers cooked from random internet pages, confidently wrong — the dangerous kind of wrong. Like most of us, I stayed away.
Things have moved fast. Plug an AI directly into the actual manuals — manufacturer docs, company manuals, local or cloud — and it's a different game.
Spot-on answers, with the exact reference, faster than any of us could dig them out. You ask, you get the paragraph, you verify in 5 seconds.
Yet some still push back. "Safety concerns", observation periods that keep getting extended... I sometimes wonder what's really being observed.
Question for the group: has anyone tried feeding AI from XML manual sources instead of PDF? PDF was a transition format and I'm glad something is finally forcing it out. The jump in accuracy with structured sources is impressive.
Curious who else is experimenting — and what your training/ops departments say about it.