Originally Posted by
jellycopter
It rather depends upon how you measure performance doesn't it?
I am sure Hill is measuring it by the number of people he convinces to part with their money.
He isn't fundamentally reinventing the turbine engine, his revolution is to make it himself and, allegedly, cheaply.
There is little in his revolution that will make the package produce twice the power at half the fuel and twice the lifespan, which seems to be the promise (exaggerating, but you get the gist).
We will find out soon enough when he manages to get his revolution, errr, revolving
