Originally Posted by
duncan_bayne
It astounds me that people are using LLMs unsupervised, for any purpose.
I've seen someone use ChatGPT on multiple occasions to make airworthiness based decisions.
For example, asking it if two standards are the same to determine if compliance with one satisfies the other (these are paywalled national standards, so it's doubtful that the LLM can access beyond the title of the standards and a few sketchy blog posts related to it).
Or asking it whether or not a procedure is compliant with Part 42 regulations.
Or asking it if a particular generic part is compatible with a particular aircraft.
And on and on.
Using an LLM as a crutch to hide behind when you are in a position beyond your capability is unconscionable, yet these people walk amongst us.