PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NATO vs Russia
Thread: NATO vs Russia
View Single Post
Old 11th April 2026 | 17:45
  #4499 (permalink)  
West Coast
Community Builder
Community Influencer
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,918
Likes: 609
From: surfing, watching for sharks
Originally Posted by Asturias56
"Should short fuse tasking require an immediate military response to a situation, there’s no better tool than a carrier."

Assuming its in range - otherwise it has to position - and land based aircraft can do that much faster
Short fuse rarely means a minutes away response. Even when the ship itself is not physically in range, its air wing is. A carrier’s power is undeniable, both politically and militarily. Politically, knowing a CSG is steaming towards your shore sends a message. Militarily, even with a ship far off, those aircraft have a long reach, especially when tanking from organic assets or perhaps even off USAF assets. This was the norm where land locked Afghanistan was on the receiving end of carrier based jets launched from carriers. Carriers that were “in range” to use your words despite operating long distances away from the target area.
West Coast is online now  
Reply