Originally Posted by
Tu.114
The other part of the deleted post saying that NATO was not there to cater for every whim of the US president
Did you bother reading
my post in response to the DJT tweet that ORAC had provided? I was a few miles ahead of the other canine on that one.
Here, let me help you, in part...
Originally Posted by My Own Bad Self
But to declare that NATO has not been there for us is both untrue and unfair.
Being in NATO has never been about "I say jump, you ask how high" - it's been about building consensus and then embarking on a course of action together.
If one doesn't do the first part, it's not right to complain about others not directly participating (in this case in Iran) in the second part.
I answered the mail on that before it was even asked for.
You are welcome.
Iran’s IRGC warns it will target U.S. companies in the region, including Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel, IBM, Tesla, and Boeing, in retaliation for attacks on Iran, starting 8 p.m. Tehran time on April 1st.
IRGC:
"For every elimination, a US company will be destroyed. Since the most central entity in planning and locating elimination targets is American ICT and AI companies, in response to this terrorist act, from now on, the central institutions influencing terrorist actions will be legitimate targets from our perspective."
They've been consistent.
If we bleed, you bleed.
IRGC Aerospace Force Commander Moosavi:
Today, we attacked the residence of American pilots and aircrew in Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia, with a drone and a missile, and struck a gathering of 200 people.
Now, to the list of casualties and damages for Trump and Hegseth, apart from the AWACS, tankers, and fuel depots, a list of casualties and injuries to the flight crew has also been added.
More of the same.
If we bleed, you bleed.