Originally Posted by
Lonewolf_50
fdr: In order to have a Nuremberg, you have to be the winning side in a war. Not disagreeing with your take on the level of un-thinking that is on display.
LW, my problem is I absolutely agree with you, you gotta be on the winning side, but that leads to the follow on problem; how does this new fangled alternative use for goat parts end up with any winner?
what does winning look like?
Not much of what is happening looks like a cogent plan crafted by experts in sober reflection of consequences. It has all the hall marks of Boris Yeltsin holding a rave party in a vodka production facility.
Hoping they Iran runs out of missiles before Israel runs out of buildings seems like a poor plan. Same for VLCC, warships vs drones, missiles, 120, 155 rounds etc. goats with flippers and aqualung and limpet mines.
Iran has a reasonable position to be irritated with their government being plinked off in an undeclared “expedition”, pretty sure our side would feel that way too.