PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - suitable airport vs immediate landing
View Single Post
Old 24th September 2025 | 19:56
  #21 (permalink)  
rigpiggy
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 15
From: yyz
Originally Posted by FullWings
I think Swissair 111 was the catalyst for a rethink of policy and checklists. There was a possibility that it might have been more survivable had they just dived it at the nearest runway.

It’s a very difficult decision if you’re some time away from any airfield. If there’s obvious smoke/heat and failing systems then it’s been made for you but what if there isn’t? There are parallels to an evacuation on the ground in that you know it is likely that people will be injured and/or killed during it, especially on a widebody. It’s a bit easier in Europe where you are often within 15mins of some tarmac and the outcome of a expedited landing is not generally in doubt but the same scenario over northern Canada in the winter is very different. Dark, -30C, rocks, frozen lakes and polar bears... You’d want to be nigh on 100% sure you were going to burn to death in the air before you attempted to put it down somewhere.
swissair had Halifax made, the captain insisted on turning outbound to dump fuel over the ocean. More intent on making it a training exercise. I'm mostly shorthaul 1 hr is a long flight. All the F/Or are.trained if you can't confirm it is out plan to land within the next 10 mins, because statistically your king calls off at 12
rigpiggy is offline  
Reply