The book "The illusion of safety" has been widely referenced and a ChatGPT review published:
https://chatgpt.com/share/687e3d50-9...8-b51a51b2e65c
NOTE, this is not the time or place to critique Chatbots (LLM); hold your thoughts.
Wide ranging discussions have considered aspects of the review. Whilst people quoted hallucination (humans hallucinate, machines have 'errors'), one conclusion is that although the review does-not fully or accurately represent the book, the content of the LLM review identifies valid, not fictitious, points of safety - probably drawn from other references.
As an alternative view, a 'human' web review was used for comparison, together with prompts exploring references. Again it was not possible to correlate this with the book, but from a safety viewpoint there is useful information to trigger individual thinking - a value of machine based searching.
https://chatgpt.com/share/689ae478-3...4-80bd34ab64e6
Before concluding too much;
- are the machine generated safety points valid and accurate wrt wide ranging human thoughts on these subjects ?
- does a LMM review help clarify - prioritise conflicting safety ideas promoted by humans ?
- how might this information alter opinion on the use of new technologies ?
- - is safety an illusion ?