Originally Posted by
Mick OXsmall
I agree that the truth likely lies somewhere in the middle, but the gentleman above appears to be staunchly defending EK remuneration without having a full grasp of the broader context. Either he is not currently employed by EK, or he has only recently joined. He’s overlooking several key aspects.
For instance, EK roster system does not align with the practices of the airlines he is so quick to criticise. Particularly when it comes to days off and acclimatisation. If, like many crew, you are from his most hated countries such as the UK or Australia, it is effectively impossible to travel home during your days off. The limited time off combined with acclimatisation rules makes such travel impossible. He’s missing the work/life balance part of his argument completely.
Moreover, the pay and benefits package is not as competitive as he seems to suggest when compared with several of the airlines he disparaged. His argument demonstrates a clear lack of insight into both the current employment landscape at EK and the lived experiences of many of its crew.
I would also note that there are four countries in the United Kingdom, the gentleman appears unaware.
that’s the funniest thing I have read for a while