Originally Posted by
dagenham
Not massively but thought you had a decent source rather than mate at a meeting trope,
He likely cites the nonsense figure of forecast c£2.5bn inward investment resulting from that tour which cannot be quantified or qualified, much would likely have occurred whether they toured or not. It makes not one iota difference where the bloody aircraft is made and constraining ourselves to a low wing piece of #### that doesn’t even exist nor meet requirements for Phase 4 is half the bloody problem. For those really interested do some due diligence on their Chairman (fraud investigations but couldn’t get anything to stick) and a board of advisor member (Mr TFASA and China training, photos and emails available if you ask nicely).