Nothing to do with grammar, your sentiments supporting the entirely unverified claims were perfectly clear. Took 787's post at face value perhaps?
By telling me to look up discussion, I assume you're a subject expert. Illustrated perfectly when you immediately resort to name calling someone happens to disagree with an unfounded point you're arguing on a matter you have no qualification to comment on.
Do you work at Virgin? No.
Do you know anyone at Virgin? No.
Are you a troll? Yes.
Name calling? Where, exactly do I call you any names.
I did ask you a direct question, one which you have rather conveniently ignored.
In summary, if the allegations are true, do you support an investigation?
Regarding your first 2 questions, what makes you think you are correct? Are the answers you pose just there to suit your argument?
And as for your third, now who’s name calling?😂🤣