As someone responsible for writing and updating OMs, can I say that is some of the most unfit for purpose verbiage (even with proper formatting) I have seen in a long time.
The purpose of an OM is like a babel fish. It should take arse covering legislative NAA legalese and translate it into clear and concise words to the simplest pilot in your cohort to accurately interpret under time pressure.
If that’s as good as I could come up with I’d stand down from my OM authorship. You have my sympathies.