Originally Posted by
rattman
I dont think I have read drivel and total rubbish in article in my life ASPI used to be somewhat legit but have gone full retard in the last few years. I just think they they are desperate for content they will allow anyone to make submissions with close to zero editorial oversight
I did say 'novel'. I can see hurdles in what he suggests, and of course further delays from any further change in direction. But when decision was made to cancel Attack class and go nuclear, what consideration of delays in achieving capability was made back then??
If this is drivel and total rubbish, then what are you saying about the selection process for senior RAN positions?
In any case, if ASPI are desperate for content, then it is a good opportunity to submit a critical review of what he was proposing.