Originally Posted by
helispotter
Josh, I recommend you start a new thread along the lines of "Archaic technology in the General Aviation sector" to see what spread of views you get back. But you should give more specific examples of areas you see as archaic technology on say a Cessna 172 or a Robinson R44. For example, are you saying the engine tech is old?, instrumentation?, structural materials?, aerodynamic design?, safety aids available to the pilots?
Yeah, agreed. I will do that!
I really appreciate everyone's input on the original topic, I feel a lot better about what's going on with the report now.