NTSB preliminary report accuracy importance
Hey guys, new account as I've never posted. Have my SEL PPL (little over 100h in 172s) and have been working on my rotory wing addon.
As I was progressing through training, we got to the point we were beginning work on simulated autorotations. Unfortunately on the very first demonstration the engine in our 2023 R44 Raven II (~100h on airframe) failed and we were forced into doing an actual autorotation where substantial damage was done to the airframe (I have cockpit video but I can't post links).
What I'm hoping you can help me understand is how important the narrative in the preliminary report is and if I'm overreacting that the narrative has this sentence "While enroute to the practice area, the instructor discussed the maneuver before the student pilot took control of the helicopter and entered a simulated autorotation". The tail is N6960 if you want to read the whole thing.
I was not in control of the helicopter and I did not enter the simulated autorotation. The video and my instructor's narrative (that he shared with me and I found accurate) does not show this. I texted my instructor and the owner of the flight school in a rather heated group text as I'm assuming that these reports can be important for insurance and other purposes, and I felt like there was just too much incentive for the flight to be spun this way for it to be unintentional...
Am I overreacting as to the importance of the accuracy here?