No relevant Responses
Interesting that nobody above has challenged the basic premise of the AI response, i.e., that the pilots' ASI's (with a non-responsive "stuck" pressure) will underread in a descent. Perhaps you should re-read what Bernoulli has had to say on the subject and think it through in the nether recesses of your amygdala. Whilst it is readily agreed that one should not take an authoritative answer at face value, you should also be able to demonstrate just why it may be wrong.... or even argue for what reason it is right (or conditionally incorrect).
Reminds me of a proof of life document sent to me by a pension provider. It was ( I foolishly assumed) required to be presented to a Justice of the Peace for attestation and stamping/signature. In my Drivers' Licence photo I have a beard - but I presented myself clean-shaven and shorn. She (the JP) refused to sign me up, saying that this person depicted on the licence could be anyone once shorn. "You appear to be 20 years younger than this person". Upon sighting the birth certificate with the exact same D.o.B. she claimed that I could be the gentleman's son. Upon sighting my signature, she claimed that she couldn't verify it against the one shown on my licence as she was not a signature expert. I offered to give her a blood sample which she rejected also. Utility bills she claimed, proved nothing.
As it turned out, the whole demurrral hinged upon the requirement to testify that she had known me for a period of not less than five years (she'd recently blown in from NSW). Upon sighting that 5 year proviso, I realised that a JP's signature was a step too far and (within her view) got the aged library cleaner (who didn't know me from Adam) to sign me up. Worked OK and I'm still drawing my pension. Planning to get copilot AI to sign me up again next year... with a bogus signature. Should be manageable.