My first post on this subject was casting doubt on the way some instructors teach the tecnical subjects S A S clearly knows what he is talking about but like a lot of what happens in PPL training sweeping generalisations have been used in the first few posts made.
It is a very hard circle to square between over complication and brevaty and this was half my point by pushing this debate along.
A number of times I have been asked to do the last few lesons of a PPL course only to find that the technical knowlage of the student is practicly zero.
If the student is a young and atractive girl the knowlage is usualy below zero , I can only hazard a guess as to what the young flying instructor was thinking about over the course.
It is up to all us instructors to think and speak clearly on these subjects and try to find the correct balance between tecnical accuacy and the level of knowlage that will allow the student to fly safely.