Originally Posted by
Kratz
Moreover, they also claim that usage of manual thrust also produces higher amount of hard landings and unstable approaches.
In a sane world, this would be a wakeup call to institute a mass retraining program to learn how to fly with manual thrust.
Although there is a provision that the a/thrust must be disconnected if it doesn't work well (due to gusts etc.)
What kind of upside down backwards perversion of logic says that manual thrust is too dangerous in normal circumstances when you can choose the time and place for easy conditions, low stress, low workload etc., but at the same time expects you to do it off the cuff right when the conditions are most difficult and you have no practice at it?!