Originally Posted by
Asturias56
"We (insert political party here) are the elected government of (insert country here). This is what we're going to do. If you don't like it you should have won the last election - tough!"
We (insert party) are the elected government and have looked into the rational of decision "xyz" and are going to cancel decision "xyz" and instead pursue "abc" instead.
If party B doesn't get solid justification from party A, and can't establish it once in government, seems a fair call. It has happened before, including major defence projects. Is that a good way to run a country?
Heck, party A didnt even have consistent plan about submarine acquisition under three different Prime Ministers. Latest decision change seemed to have been argued on the flimsy basis of changed strategic circumstances or similar vague words. I can dig out the media from the time to check the words. Expain that if you can.