The subject of learning keeps reappearing with differing views.
A resilience view is presented in Chapt 14 of 'Resilience Engineering in Practice' and considers the interface with the other key resilience abilities. It succinctly argues the need to learn from normal operations, what goes right, and not from outcome.
The critical aspect is to consider the functioning of the operating system during normal work, seeking an understanding of how people adapt in situations which do not have SOPs - those requiring judgement e.g. pre-landing check of performance to ensure a safe landing.
Landings normally 'go right', successes, each with different levels of risk - but how close to the boundary of acceptability - how safe, how resilient is our operation during landings.
Learning should consider the uncertainty in the input data, what is known / unknown - wet runway, but how wet, and the assumptions made - e.g that the published performance has the same safety margin for a wide range of water depth, except that it doesn't, and that is not known.
Limited time Link;
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ddq6h...lfh9n0p34&dl=0
Also:
"… helping people to see the overall structures, patterns and cycles in systems, rather than seeing only specific events or elements …"
https://learningforsustainability.ne...cated-complex/ Note comments
Related: learn from situations explained with stories - visualisation
https://www.thehumandiver.com/blog/common-sense