PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Poor APU reliability
View Single Post
Old 14th June 2024 | 13:57
  #14 (permalink)  
aeromech3
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2011
: LAME
Posts: 237
Likes: 7
From: Surrey UK
"The 777 was the first time that Boeing went out of their way to ensure and validate the APU as a reliable system - because it was needed for ETOPS (especially 'early' ETOPS)."
Also with our intro of the B767-300ER and need for ETOPS we had to monitor the APU serviceability mostly, that it would start/run at altitude and oil uplifts were within limits. also a GTCP 331-200 and not the more powerful -400 unit.
Up until ETOPS the APU was considered a dead weight (unless you wanted MEL dispatch with a main geny out) and as such they were built rather light for the hard work expected on the ground..
aeromech3 is offline  
Reply