FR are well known for their fondness of 'free advertising' but there are some depths to which they should not stoop.
Maybe it's the thought of offsetting their reported dip in profits of, close to £17m, that has coloured their vision and enticed them to recoup perhaps as much as £12m through this discriminating charge.
Consider a situation whereby a person of limited mobility requires an out patient visit to a hospital and requires the use of a wheelchair from the car park to the appropriate clinic; should the hospital impose a charge on that individual simply because a walk from the car park is considered too long? What about a levy on all patients attending the hospital?
I DON'T think so. Wheelchairs should be provided as part of the service.