Originally Posted by
john_tullamarine
(d) I'd rather follow the engine failure procedure for the applicable runway. Not quite as easy at that. A better option is for the operator to schedule defensible approach go around procedures for difficult aerodromes/runways.
Our operator stipulates balked landing procedures for go around below minima in case of significant terrain risk. That said if terrain is the reason for the G/A gradient, as opposed to noise/airspace, I'd be inclined to have the EFATO procedure in the secondary flight plan just in case...