Originally Posted by
CW247
Of course, the entity known as Boeing wouldn't do it. But someone who is suffering financially as a result of the exposè might. So personally? Yes.
Exactly. The first question is always "who stands to gain?" (or to loose, depending on the framing). And to focus not only on the biggest player. Subcontractors? Individuals?
And since you have referred to a "national security" actor, why stop there? National security is defined pretty widely these days. Not just that the other arm of Boeing is close to the apex of the "defense" pyramid, what about testimony harming directly or indirectly the national economy?
BTW: the accent goes the other way: é , but then nobody's perfect, especially not idle diffuse conspiracy speculators...