Originally Posted by
Keanaga
numpty
He's right. When your anchor carrier, responsible for by far and away the majority of your footfall, pays "relatively little" in terms of airport fees, then MAG can't just splash the cash with no ROI. But STN remains overwhelmingly Ryanair and the business will have to spend accordingly. I was through last weekend and it was absolutley fine, amazing what a cross subsidy from a group can do when you need a new terminal. But BAA was a state enterprise when the Norman Foster STN was being planned, MAG isn't quite the same.
Or maybe I am wrong and MAN revenue will be spent at a group level at STN?