Originally Posted by
OzzyOzBorn
No dummy spat out here. I highlighted three avoidable deficiencies in the original press release. You deemed that a "rant" - but if you choose to read a post in angry voice mode, that is on you. It wasn't written that way.
Interpretation of what is trivial or not is purely subjective. My view is that a deficiency which has been pointed out can be addressed in next month's press release, such that the issue will not recur. It's called providing positive feedback, and responsible companies value that.
Whatever, dude.
Bet you're great fun at parties.