PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - S-92 Loss of control event - report
View Single Post
Old 29th Feb 2024, 14:15
  #34 (permalink)  
HeliComparator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 67
Posts: 2,090
Received 39 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by PlasticCabDriver
Min IAS couple on the EC175 is 30kts, but it will engage GA in the hover. If no AP presets already made it will automatically select Vy and 1000ft/min RoC, otherwise it will use the presets. One of the reasons we don’t routinely use it from the hover is that if you are OEI below Vtoss (which in a 175 on the N Sea is always 40kts) it will prioritise getting to that Vtoss, which may result in a a rate of descent. However, it gets to Vtoss pretty quick so under the vast majority of N Sea conditions you would be unlikely to see much RoD if any. SOP is to engage GA at Vtoss.

Helpfully, if there is no lateral mode already coupled, then it will also roll wings level as well as accelerate and climb. It does that well enough and quickly enough to use as a Get Out Of Jail Free card in disorientation scenarios similar to that being discussed.
Surely if you go OEI low and slow, you want to get to Vtoss quickly. It should probably result in a rate of descent unless you are light. If you don't accelerate to Vtoss quickly, you will lose more height.

However time and time again we see that oil and gas accidents are caused by crew disorientation. Accidents are not caused by engine failures. And yet it seems there is still some prioritisation of engine failure risk over crew disorientation risk. Are they crazy?

Last edited by HeliComparator; 29th Feb 2024 at 14:17. Reason: they are crazy!
HeliComparator is offline  
The following users liked this post: