Originally Posted by
Sharklet_321
That's 10% of the passenger throughput at PIK which is a very good proportion. Others would envy that.
But how many of those are actually airport passengers when you consider airport staff, contractors, visitors and those indeed that use it for local convenience. The actual percentage is likely much smaller than 10%.
That said the rail link is undoubtedly a selling point for PIK, I'm surprised more passenger traffic isn't lured to PIK over GLA for that. Wizz still baffles me why they don't use PIK anymore, I'd have thought it a good fit for them.