Originally Posted by
ATNotts
Isn't it really all about whether the airline wants high revenue passengers, in which case the daily service at business friendly times is the answer, or if volume leisure traffic is the goal then lower frequency is acceptable. The clever (supposedly) people within the business's financial department probably know, or believe they know how much front end traffic they could attract operating daily in the low season and made their decisions based on that assumption.
I guess I’m trying to challenge this thought process.
That it’s all and only about what the airline wants. That the airport can do nothing.
Turning this on its head, the airline frankly doesn’t care where the passengers came from, just that they did.
I will again ask why Warsaw is advertised as a connection point NYC to PEK but Manchester isn’t.
It’s not because the “connection” cannot be done, it’s because nobody even considers it because it isn’t advertised.
That’s marketing, not airline operations.
This has to be ripe for disruption.