PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 3rd Feb 2024, 22:55
  #7262 (permalink)  
langleybaston
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,292
Received 735 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
https://www.navylookout.com/mechanic...nato-exercise/

Mechanical issue prevents HMS Queen Elizabeth from sailing on NATO exercise

During last-minute checks ahead of sailing for NATO exercise Steadfast Defender, it has been discovered that HMS Queen Elizabeth has a significant issue with her starboard propeller shaft. The ship will not sail on 4th February as planned and instead, HMS Prince of Wales will be readied to replace her.

The RN has instituted additional checks on the aircraft carrier’s shaft lines as a result of the painful lessons learned from past experience with HMS Prince of Wales. In the course of an inspection, concerns have arisen around one of the couplings on the starboard shaft.

It should be noted that this is not the same problem that afflicted HMS Prince of Wales. Although the ship remains in class (ie. technically seaworthy), it has been decided as a sensible precaution, to withdraw her from the exercise until the issue can be thoroughly investigated and remedied.

The Fleet Commander said: “Routine pre-sailing checks yesterday identified an issue with a coupling on HMS Queen Elizabeth’s starboard propeller shaft. As such, the ship will not sail on Sunday. HMS Prince of Wales will take the place of HMS Queen Elizabeth on NATO duties and will set sail for Exercise Steadfast Defender as soon aspp possible.“
Bloody hell. What a bunch of incompetent prats we have become.
I weep for my country.
Beyond belief.
Apologists step forward and lie to me that those responsible for defence of the realm are not over promoted brown nosers.
langleybaston is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by langleybaston: