PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - RAVN ex-RoKAF Hawk Mk 67 aircraft
View Single Post
Old 24th Jan 2024, 10:21
  #18 (permalink)  
Davef68
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,711
Received 40 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
I'm sure they could, but that, and the corresponding ballast in the rear fuselage, would have a significant effect on the centre fuselage top longeron fatigue life, especially at the joints. The 100 series and onwards needed progressive improvements and mods as the equipment fit (e.g. FLIR&Laser) and requirements (10,000 - 12,000 flying hours) were demanded by customers. Although the Mk.67 is essentially a 100 series fuselage, so has some scope, changes would still all need to be assessed and cleared by a suitable authority - which is where we started in the OP !
But if they were fitted from new (and the mk 67 had the radome from new) then BAE would be the design authority? Or did they have a radome but no radar?


Davef68 is offline