PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 50 years of the Lockheed Martin F-16
View Single Post
Old 23rd Jan 2024, 21:52
  #17 (permalink)  
typerated
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by gums
Salute!

I would have loved to fly the XL in combat as an interdiction platform with great legs and payload, plus a competitive A2A capability. By the time the XL was flying and the Mudhen came along, USAF wanted the versatilty of the Viper a lot. And make no mistake, the Eagle mafia was still working to keep the plane in production. Some folks kept harping on the Viper not having a BVR missile, although it was gonna get the Slammer before the Eagle due to the data bus and such, even if the Viper radar did not have the mid-course update capability at that time.

The most depressing aspect of all the development programs from late 80's and 90's , IMHO, was the very long time to get the F-35 on the ramp. The F-22 not as depressing except for the reduced buy, but it got airframes flying and deployed more quickly than the F-35.

Gums sends...
The interdiction role (that most F-16s end up spending most time doing) would obviously have been better undertaken by the XL.

But the ANG units flying the F-16 as an interceptor also seemed to be crying out for the XL - lots of extra range - more payload and speed - what's not to like?

The Draken with a similar wing was only an interceptor by the swedes and as an interdictor by the Danes...
typerated is offline