Originally Posted by
SECsmachine
@NatZulu; not going to get drawn into it here but what is a fact is that the vast majority of pilots were offered re-employment, and a handful were not.
You and I can speculate on the ‘real’ reasons all day, and I am certain each case has individual circumstances, but it's also clear from your posts here, and those you’ve made on the other non-anonymous forums, that not everyone shares your interpretation of events or ‘facts’. But I’m sure you’ll get your day in court, and sincerely hope you find some closure as a result.
....the thing is that,with respect, I'm not "speculating" - you are. And that was my point.
And speculating with such accusatory narrative and in such a definative tone as your previous posting on the matter, without having the evidence in front of you, is contributory to the ongoing damage done to reputations of unfortunate victims of this fiasco. Hence my reply - intended not to "draw you in", but rather to correct unsubstantiated and incorrect stated "facts".
You are clearly aware I can substantiate my own comments as you seem to indicate that you know who I am!
I guess if only "a handful" did not get their jobs back then it is not too much of a concern to you. It may well be to others reading this, and certainly to the hundreds of previous colleagues (handful?!) that have court claims currently in the system.